Integration relations features in capital flow management

  • Olga Gulyaeva Tver State University
  • Irina Vyakina Tver State Technical University
Keywords: economic integration, business groups, investments, investment risk, economic security


The purpose of the study is to determine the essence of business integration and quasi-integration as mechanisms for capital flow management and to identify the impact of business integration on the nature of capital flows. The subject of the study is integration and integration relations as means of capital consolidation, resource sharing, ensuring the effectiveness of capital flows management and reducing investment risks. Methods of research. The article uses methods of theoretical generalization and comparison, observation, induction and deduction, system analysis and synthesis. The essence of integration and quasi-integration is investigated in the article, the analysis of influence of business integration on the nature and mechanisms of capital flow management is carried out and features of integration relations within the framework of capital flow management is revealed. Conclusions. The relationship between the elements of the business structure can be integrative or quasiintegrative. The nature of integration relations between the business elements has a direct impact on the business structures management, the level of investment risk and the mechanisms of capital flow management. Analysis reviles that the advantages of diversified integration are higher in countries with less developed capital markets. Such effect takes place due to the ability of intra-group financial resources maneuvering. Businesses have to adapt to weak institutions by establishing business structures that reduce the level of transaction costs in the context of weak capital markets and insufficiency of financial regulation and external financing.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Goto, A. Business groups in a market economy // European Economic Review, 1982, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 53-70.

2. Williamson, O. E. Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press, 1975. p. 286

3. Cable, J., Yasuki, H. Internal organization, business groups and corporate performance: An empirical test of the multidivisional hypothesis in Japan // International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1985, vol.3, no.4, pp. 401-420.

4. Brioschi, F., Buzzacchi, L., Colombo, M. G. Risk capital financing and the separation of ownership and control in business groups // Journal of Banking & Finance, 1989, vol. 13, no. 4–5, pp. 747-772.

5. Khanna, T., Yafeh, Y. Business groups and risk sharing around the world // The Journal of Business, 2005, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 301-340.

6. Khanna, T., Rivkin J. W. Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. // Strategic Management Journal, 2001, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 45–74<45::AID-SMJ147>3.0.CO;2-F

7. Granovetter, M. Business Groups and Social Organization / N. Smelser and R. Swedberg (eds.). The Handbook of Economic Sociology, 2nd Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005, рp. 429-450.

8. Bena, J., Ortiz-Molina, H. Pyramidal ownership and the creation of new firms // Journal of Financial Economics. 2013, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 798–821.

9. Chang, S. The Rise and Fall of Chaebols: Financial Crisis and Transformation of Korean Business Groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 378 p.

10. Chung, C. Markets, Culture, and Institutions: The Emergence of Large Business Groups in Taiwan, 1950s-1970s. // Journal of Management Studies, 2001, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 719–745.

11. He, J., Mao, X., Rui, O. M., Zha, X. Business groups in China // Journal of Corporate Finance, 2013, vol.22, pp. 166-192.

12. Collin, S. Why Are These Islands of Conscious Power Found in the Ocean of Ownership Institutional and Governance Hypotheses Explaining the Existence of Business Groups in Sweden // Journal of Management Studies, 1998, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 719–746.

13. Garrido, C. National Private Groups in Mexico, 1987-I993. CEPAL Review 1994, vol. 53, pp. 159-175

14. Chauhan, Y., Dey, D. K., Jha, R. R. Board structure, controlling ownership, and business groups: Evidence from India // Emerging Markets Review, 2016, vol. 27, pp. 63-83.

15. Xavier, W. G., Bandeira-de-Mello, R., Marcon, R. Institutional environment and Business Groups' resilience in Brazil // Journal of Business Research, 2014, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 900-907.

16. Belderbos, R., Wakasugi, R., Zou, J. Business groups, foreign direct investment, and capital goods trade: The import behavior of Japanese affiliates // Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 2012, vol. 26, no.2, pp. 187-200.

17. Almeida, H., Park, S. Y., Subrahmanyam, M. G., Wolfenzon, D. The structure and formation of business groups: Evidence from Korean chaebols // Journal of Financial Economics, 2011, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 447-475.

18. Dementyev V.E. Business integration and economic development / Preprint # WP/98/038. М.: CEMI RAS, 1998. 114 p.

19. Dementyev V.E. Revisiting the discussion of the role of the state corporations in Russian economic strategy // Russian economic magazine, 2008, №1-2. p. 27-41

20. Pappe Y.S. Russian large business: the first 15 years. Economic Chronicles 1993–2008 / Pappe Y.S., Galukhina Y.S.; HSE. М.: Est. HSE, 2009. 423 p.

21. Avdasheva S. B., Dementyev V.E. Corporate and non-property integration mechanisms in Russian business groups // Russian economic magazine, 2000. № 1. p. 13 - 27.

22. George, R., Kabir, R. Heterogeneity in business groups and the corporate diversification–firm performance relationship // Journal of Business Research, 2012, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 412-420.

23. Dementyev V.E. Quasi-integration in the focus of institutional theory // University Bulletin, Institutional Economics Series, №1(2), М.: SMU, 2001, p. 84-95.

24. Eccles, R. The Quasifirm in the Construction Industry // Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1981, vol.2, no.4, pp.335-357.

25. Tretyak O.A., Rumyantseva M.N. Network forms of corporate cooperation: approaches to phenomenon explaining // Russian management magazine, 2003, vol. 1, №2, p. 25-50.

26. Rajan, R., Servaes, H., Zingales, L. The Cost of Diversity: The Diversification Discount and Inefficient Investment // Journal of Finance, 2000, vol. 55, pp. 35-80.

27. Fauver, L., Houston, J., Naranjo, A. Cross-Country Evidence on the Value of Industrial and International Diversification // Journal of Corporate Finance, 2004, Vol. 10, pp. 729-752.

28. Claessens, S., Fan, J., Lang, L. The Benefits and Costs of Group Affiliation: Evidence from East Asia, // Emerging Markets Review, 2006, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–26

Author Biographies

Olga Gulyaeva, Tver State University

Gulyaeva Olga, PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Finance

Irina Vyakina, Tver State Technical University

Vyakina Irina, PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Economics and Production Management 

How to Cite
Gulyaeva, O., & Vyakina, I. (2018). Integration relations features in capital flow management. University Economic Bulletin, (37/1), 208-217. Retrieved from
Finance, Monetary Circulation and Credit