Foundations of industrial policy in the countries with different levels of development: lessons for Ukraine

  • Liudmyla Deineko Institute for economics and forecasting NAS of Ukraine
  • Olena Tsyplitska Institute for economics and forecasting NAS of Ukraine
Keywords: industrial policy, instruments of industrial policy, innovation policy, protectionism, technological modernization, level of economic development

Abstract

Relevance of the research topic is due to the need of developed and developing states of the world in renaissance and improvement of industrial policy as a key instrument of economic development strategy in a globalizing world. Formulation of the problem. The efficiency of industrial policy in countries with different level of development depends on the fact how principles the policy is based on take into consideration the starting national conditions and requirements and trends of global market. For the countries with the same levels of income it is possible to determine the common directions of industrial development strategies and efficient tools of industrial policy. Under similar starting conditions differences in approaches to industrial policy may also determine the differences in results of its implementation; under different starting conditions they can entail the smoothing out of economic performance and a rapid convergence of economies.
Analysis of recent research and publications. Some issues on industrial policy implementation in the countries of the world were investigated by both domestic and foreign scholars: A. I. Amosha, A. Andreoni, K. Warwick, V. P. Vyshnevsky, V. M. Heyets, G. Cresti, J. Lin., V. I. Liashenko, A. Noman, I. Nubler, K. Ohno, H. alazar-Xirinachs, E. Starikov, J. Stiglitz, V. Treichel, K. Shwab. Selection of unexplored parts of the general problem. In spite of the multiple attempts to generalize the approaches and instruments of industrial policy for groups of countries the search of optimal design of industrial policy is still going on, what makes the adoption of important industrial development regulations complicated and is the reason of bitter discussions between the branches of authorities in the course of formation of Strategy of Ukrainian industrial complex development, legislative regulation of «industrial visa-free» and export duties on some types of feedstock. Setting the task, the purpose of the study. The purpose of the study is generalization of the experience of industrial policies in countries with different levels of economic development and justification of the need to use it in setting the basic principles of domestic industrial policies. Method or methodology for conducting research. In the research we used general and specific scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, induction and deduction, historical, comparison, dialectical method of knowledge; also methods of statistical analysis, monographic research for countries’ experience, expert assessment method for elaboration the recommendations on industrial policy implementation in transformation economies. Presentation of the main material (results of work). The industrial policy of three groups of countries – with high, middle and low income – are studied due to their historical development. Socioeconomic and institutional conditions of countries, where the implementation of a certain type of industrial policy had positive or negative results, were determined. The analysis of the Ukrainian industrial performance and industrial policy showed that the policy should be revised according to the relevance of instruments and measures to the challenges of internal and global environment. The priority directions of industrial development are determined and the key principles of industrial policy in Ukraine are justified based on foreign experience. The field of application of results. The results of this research can be applied in the process of industrial regulatory framework formation, in the Concept of state industrial policy and the Strategy of industrial development elaboration by central executive authorities, and in the preparation of relevant sections of programs of regions’ socioeconomic and cultural development. Conclusions according to the article. In the study it is determined that these are the protectionism measures and innovation activity stimulation which are the base of the modern industrial policies in the countries with a high level of development; the middle-income countries should prioritize innovation and technology policies; the low-income states including Ukraine should focus on industrial modernization, import substitution, and the integration into global value chains in order to accelerate their socioeconomic development and strengthen the competitiveness over the world markets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Andreoni, A. (2017). Varieties of Industrial Policy: Models, Packages, and Transformation Cycles in«Efficiency, Finance, and Varieties of Industrial Policy: Guiding Resources, Learning, and Technology for Sustained Growth», ed. by A. Noman and J. E. Stiglitz, New York, Columbia University Press, p. 245-305.

2. Promyslova polityka postkryzovoyi ekonomiky (2014). [Industrial policy of post-crisis economy]; ed. by Deineko L. V.; Yakubovskiy M. M. NAS Ukraine. DU «Instytut ekon. ta prognoz. NAN Ukrayiny», Kyiv.

3. Lin, J. Y. (2012). New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development and Policy. Washington, 371 p.

4. Lin, J. Y., Treichel, V. (2014). Making Industrial Policy Work for Development. Transforming Economies: Making Industrial Policy Work for Growth, Jobs and Development. Ed. by Jose M. Salazar-Xirinachs, I. Nubler, R. Kozul-Wright. ILO, p. 65-78.

5. Ramdoo, Isabelle (2015). Industrial Policies in a Changing World: What Prospects for Low-Income Countries? E15Initiative. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and World Economic Forum.

6. Weiss, John (2015). Industrial Policy in High-Income Economies. E15Initiative. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and World Economic Forum.

7. Guadagno, Francesca (2015). Industrial Policies in Lower-Middle-Income Countries. E15 Initiative. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and World Economic Forum.

8. State Statistical Service of Ukraine. URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ [in Ukr.]

9. Produktyvnist’ pratsi ta productyvnist’ kapitalu (2018). [Labour productivity and capital productivity]. Kyiv, Ministerstvo ekonomichnogo rozvytku i torgivli Ukrayiny. URL: http://www.me.gov.ua/Documents/Detail?lang=uk-UA&id=d5f5b5a2-7689-488d-afab-6420bb349679&title=ProduktivnistPratsiTaProduktivnistKapitalu [in Ukr.]

10. Ohno, K. (2016). The Quality of Industrial Policy and Middle Income Traps: Comparing Vietnam with Other Countries. VNU Journal of Science , Vol. 32, No. 1S, p. 179-189.

11. CIP 2018. UNIDO. URL: http://stat.unido.org/database/CIP%202018

12. Merchandise trade matrix – product groups, exports in thousands of United States dollars, annual UNCTADSTAT. URL: https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=24739

13. Rozvytok promyslovosti dlia zabezpechennia zrostannia ta onovlennia ukrayinskoyi economiky [Development of industry for growth and renewal of the Ukrainian economy]; ed. by Deineko L. V., NAS Ukraine. DU «Instytut ekon. ta prognoz. NAN Ukrayiny», Kyiv, 2018, 158 р.

Author Biographies

Liudmyla Deineko, Institute for economics and forecasting NAS of Ukraine

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Head of Department of Industrial Policy

Olena Tsyplitska, Institute for economics and forecasting NAS of Ukraine

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Researcher of Department of Industrial Policy

Published
2019-11-20
How to Cite
Deineko, L., & Tsyplitska, O. (2019). Foundations of industrial policy in the countries with different levels of development: lessons for Ukraine. University Economic Bulletin, (43), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.31470/2306-546X-2019-43-99-110
Section
Еconomic Theory