Marine infrastructure of Ukraine in the rating of the world countries: current state and prospects

  • Natalia Kudrytska Institute for Economics and Forecasting of NAS of Ukraine
Keywords: maritime infrastructure, container shipping, country rating, competitiveness


The article is devoted to the problem of determining the main directions of the formation of a competitive marine infrastructure of Ukraine, the relevance of which is confirmed in the Strategy for the Development of Sea Ports of Ukraine for the period up to 2038 Marine Doctrine of Ukraine for the period up to 2035. Many scientific works of foreign and domestic scientists are devoted to the problems of increasing the competitiveness of marine infrastructure. However, it is worth noting the lack of domestic work on the problems of the development of maritime and river transport in the current economic conditions, which are characterized by the growth of globalization and integration processes. Тhe purpose of the article is to assess the position of Ukraine in the ranking of countries of the world in terms of the development of maritime transport and the definition of strategic measures for the formation of a competitive national maritime infrastructure. The author provides an overview of the state and forecast of the development of shipping in the world. The advantages of transporting goods by sea are formulated, which determine its competitiveness. The positions of Ukraine in the ranking of countries of the world in the number of ships of the marine merchant fleet and the length of waterways are determined. The characteristic of the largest world alliances in the container shipping market by sea is given. The article emphasizes the problem of the uncertain prospects for the development of shipping, which is due to a combination of geopolitical and economic risks, which is associated with trade policy, structural changes in the global economy, changes in the global energy balance, and the spread of digital technologies. Ukraine has significant potential to develop cargo and passenger transportation by river and sea. Among the former CIS countries, it ranks third in the ratings after Russia and Belarus. However, in order to improve the rating and competitiveness of our country in the international market for the provision of water transport services, a number of measures need to be taken in terms of improving safety, introducing innovative technologies, improving tariff policy, and reforming governance.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Pro zatverdzhennia Stratehii rozvytku morskykh portiv Ukrainy na period do 2038 roku [Continuation of the strategy of development of marine portraits of Ukraine for the period until 2038]. URL:

2. Pro zatverdzhennia Morskoi doktryny Ukrainy na period do 2035 roku [On approval of the Maritime Doctrine of Ukraine for the period up to 2035]. URL:

3. Pires da Cruz M. R., Matos Ferreira J. J. and Azevedo S. (2013). Key factors of seaport competitiveness based on the stakeholder perspective: An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model Maritime. Economics & Logistics, 15. 416–443. doi:10.1057/mel.2013.14.

4. Acosta, M., Coronado, D. and Cerban, M. (2007). Port competitiveness in container traf fi c from aninternal point of view: The experience of the Port of Algeciras Bay. Maritime Policy and Management, 34(5). 501–520.

5. Castillo-Manzano, J., Castro-Nunes, M., Laxe, F., Lópes-Valpuesta, L. and Arevalo-Quijada, M. (2009). Low-cost port competitiveness index Implementation in the Spanish port system. Marine Policy, 33(4). 591–598.

6. Haezendonck E., Pison G., Rousseeuw P., Struyf A. & Verbeke A. (2000). Competitive advantage of seaports. International Journal of maritime economics, Volume II, No 2, 69–82.

7. Fleming, D. and Baird, A. (1999). Some reflections on port competition in the United States and Western Europe. Maritime Policy and Management, 26(4). 383–394.

8. Guy, E. and Urli, B. (2006). Port selection and multicriteria analysis: An application to the Montreal-New York alternative. Maritime Economics and logistics, 8(2). 169–186.

9. Boiko S. Iu. (2008). Formuvannia orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnoho mekhanizmu funktsionuvannia ta rozvytku vantazhnykh portiv [Formation of organizational and economic mechanism of functioning and development of cargo ports]. URL:

10. Shibaev, A. G. & Kuprienko, S. V. (2004). Sostav i osobennosti sistemyi pokazateley i parametrov otsenki konkurentosposobnosti porta v transportnoy seti [Composition and features of the system of indicators and parameters for assessing the competitiveness of the port in the transport network]. Metody ta zasoby upravlinnia rozvytkom transportnykh system: Zb. nauk. prats, 7. 235-244.

11. Senogonov, I. E. Obzor proizvodstvennoy deyatelnosti portov Ukrainyi. Metodyi otsenki konkurentosposobnosti portov na sovremennom etape [Overview of the production activities of the ports of Ukraine. Methods for assessing the competitiveness of ports at the present stage]. URL:

12. Obzor morskogo transporta 2018 god [Review of maritime transport 2018]. URL:

13. Konkurentospromozhnist morskoi transportnoi infrastruktury Ukrainy v umovakh yevrointehratsii [Competitiveness of Ukraine's maritime transport infrastructure in the context of European integration]. URL:

14. Pidtrymannia tempu protsesu detsentralizatsii v Ukraini [Maintaining the pace of the decentralization process in Ukraine]. URL:

15. Morskie konteynernyie perevozki: kto vladeet ryinkom [Container shipping: who owns the market]. URL:

16. Volosiuk, M. V. (2014). Potentsial morehospodarskoho kompleksu – rezerv ekonomichnoho rozvytku Ukrainy [The potential of the maritime economic complex is the reserve of economic development of Ukraine]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats NUK, 1 (451).17-23.

Author Biography

Natalia Kudrytska, Institute for Economics and Forecasting of NAS of Ukraine

PhD, Senior Researcher, senior fellow for development of industrial infrastructure

How to Cite
Kudrytska, N. (2020). Marine infrastructure of Ukraine in the rating of the world countries: current state and prospects. University Economic Bulletin, (45), 151-157.
International Economics