Formation of agricultural enterprises’ competitiveness on the basis of financial and economic sustainability and security

  • Larisa Marmul Pereiaslav-Khmelnytsky Hrygorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University
  • Liudmyla Levaieva Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University
  • Vitaliy Pospolit Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University
Keywords: agricultural enterprises, competitiveness, financial and economic sustainability, economic security, levels, indicators, increase, development, management

Abstract

The subject of the research is theoretical-methodical and practical aspects of formation and ensuring the agricultural enterprises’ competitiveness taking into account the levels, dynamics, and other features of their financial and economic sustainability and economic security. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the theoretical and methodological principles and practical ways of increasing agricultural enterprises’ competitiveness based on their financial and economic sustainability and security. The methodological bases of the article are general methodological approaches, namely: dialectical, historical, monographic, system-structural analysis, and synthesis to the study of economic phenomena and processes. Legislative and normative-legal regulations for development and formation of agricultural enterprises’ competitiveness, their financial and economic sustainability and security; scientific works of leading domestic and foreign scientists on the theory and practice of competitiveness as one of the main categories of market mechanism and management in agriculture; analytical and statistical materials of the State Statistics Service are used in the work. In the work the methods of economic researches are used: abstract and logical – for substantiation of theoretical and methodical bases of agricultural enterprises’ competitiveness formation in the conditions of their financial and economic sustainability and security; in the formation of theoretical generalizations, factors and principles of competitiveness management, critical analysis of other authors’ research; statistical and economic – in determining the competitiveness of agricultural enterprises; marketing –when researching the food market and assessing market conditions for the future; comparative – when comparing indicators of enterprises’ competitiveness of the given region and agro sphere industry with the other ones; graphic – to determine structural changes in the food market; system-structural – to analyze the resource potential of agricultural enterprises’ competitiveness; analytical forecasting – to determine the system of measures of organizational and economic mechanism for its provision; economic and mathematical modelling – to substantiate the increasing of agricultural enterprises’ competitiveness, taking into account the levels of their financial and economic sustainability and security. The results of the article. It is determined that the leading importance in ensuring the agricultural enterprises’ competitiveness belongs to the competitive advantages, as well as their financial and economic sustainability and economic security. The factors and components of providing the latter are determined. A set of measures to increase financial and economic sustainability, ensure economic security as a basis for stable competitiveness, and assurance of its growth in the future is proposed. Field of application of results. The results can be used in the management of agricultural enterprises, in the educational process of higher education institutions, in training the specialists in economics and management. Conclusions. It is determined that the most significant feature of the theory and practice of rural green tourism enterprises in European countries is the expansion of their functions from purely business to more socially necessary and significant – as tools for preservation and reproduction of rural areas, including depressed ones. This provides for their greater support at the level of local communities and government, which is appropriate for all uses. It also makes sense to use the well-tested mechanisms and forms of tourism in the countryside.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Kovalev, D., Sukhorukova, T. (2005). Ekonomichna bezpeka pidpryjemstva [Economic security of enterprise]. Economics of Ukraine, 10, 48-56. [in Ukr.].

2. Razdina, E. (1997). Kommercheskaya informatsiya I ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost' predpriyatiya [Commercial information and economic security of enterprise] Biznes-inform – Business-Inform, 24, 63-65. [in Ukr.].

3. Kapustin, N. (1999). Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost' otrasli i firmy [Economic security industries and firms]. Biznes-inform – Business Inform, 11-12, 45-47. [in Ukr.].

4. Bendikov, M. (2000). Jekonomicheskaja bezopasnost' promyshlennogo predprijatija organizational methodical aspect [The economic security of industrial enterprises, organizational methodical aspect]. Consultant Director, 2, 7-13. [in Rus.].

5. Senchagov, V. K. (2007). Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost': geopolitika, globalizatsiya, samosokhranenie i razvitie. [Economic security: geopolitics, globalization, self-preservation and development]. M. : ZAO «Finstatinform». [in Rus.].

6. Ihnatenko, M. M. and Marmul', L. O. (2017). [Accounting, evaluation and diagnosis of financial and economic results of activities in the strategic management of enterprises and organizations]. Skhidna Yevropa: ekonomika, biznes ta upravlinnya, 6(11). URL: http://www.easterneurope-ebm.in.ua/11-2017-ukr [in Ukr.].

7. Іhnatenko, M. and Adamchуk, O. (2020). Pidvyshchennia konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstv silskoho zelenoho turyzmu na zasadakh brendynhu ta marketynhovykh stratehii [Improving the competitiveness of rural green tourism enterprises on the basis of branding and marketing strategies]. Agrosvit, 11, 50–57. [in Ukr.].

8. Marmul, L. O. (2008). Pidvyshchennia dokhodnosti fermerskykh hospodarstv [Advanced profitability of farmer's government]. Ekonomika APK, 5, 74-78. [in Ukr.].

9. Stakhiv, O. A. & Adamchuk, T. L. (2017). Faktory konkurentospromozhnosti silskohospodarskoho pidpryiemstva [Factors of competitiveness of the Silk and Gospodar enterprise]. Ekonomika i suspilstvo, 12, 360-365. [in Ukr.].

10. Marmulʹ, L. & Luhova, O. (2012). Metodychni pidkhody do otsinky ekonomichnoho potentsialu silʹsʹkohospodarsʹkykh pidpryyemstv [Methodical approaches to assessing the economic potential of agricultural enterprises]. Ekonomist, 2, 24-26. [in Ukr.].

11. Romanіuk, I. A. (2014). Derzhavna sotsialʹna polityka v zabezpechenni produktyvnoyi zaynyatosti silʹsʹkoho naselennya [State social policy in ensuring productive employment of rural population]. Ekonomika APK, 10, 105-109. [in Ukr.].

12. Ihnatenko M., Sarapina O., Sakun A., Marmul L. and Pylypenko K. (2019). Models of implementation of enterprises in agricultural green tourism in European countries and assessment of their efficiency. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(12), 337-340. [in Eng.].

Author Biographies

Larisa Marmul, Pereiaslav-Khmelnytsky Hrygorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Professor of the department of economics

Liudmyla Levaieva, Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University

Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Economics Department

Vitaliy Pospolit, Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University

Student of the Faculty of Financial, Economic and Vocational Education

Published
2021-03-30
How to Cite
Marmul, L., Levaieva, L., & Pospolit, V. (2021). Formation of agricultural enterprises’ competitiveness on the basis of financial and economic sustainability and security. University Economic Bulletin, (48), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.31470/2306-546X-2021-48-33-39
Section
Agrarian Еconomy